GDPR & AI: Our Commitment to the 'Right to be Forgotten' in Training Data

January 05, 2026 | Leveragai | min read

Print Copy Email Bookmark

Personal data sits at the center of modern AI systems, from recommendation engines to adaptive learning platforms. As regulations like the EU General Data Protection Regulation evolve, organizations face a harder question: how do you respect the right to

GDPR & AI: Our Commitment to the 'Right to be Forgotten' in Training Data Banner

Personal data sits at the center of modern AI systems, from recommendation engines to adaptive learning platforms. As regulations like the EU General Data Protection Regulation evolve, organizations face a harder question: how do you respect the right to be forgotten when data has already influenced an AI model? This article examines GDPR and AI through a practical lens, with a focus on training data, erasure rights, and emerging approaches like machine unlearning. It explains what the right to be forgotten means in AI contexts, why it matters for learning platforms, and how Leveragai builds GDPR compliance into its architecture and governance. Along the way, it highlights regulatory guidance, real-world examples, and concrete safeguards that help organizations balance innovation with accountability.

GDPR & AI: Our Commitment to the Right to Be Forgotten in Training Data

Understanding the Right to Be Forgotten Under GDPR and AI Systems

The right to be forgotten, formally described in Article 17 of the GDPR, allows individuals to request the deletion of their personal data when it is no longer necessary, when consent is withdrawn, or when data has been processed unlawfully (GDPR.eu, 2018). In conventional databases, this might mean deleting a record or anonymizing a profile.

AI complicates the picture. When personal data is used as AI training data, it can influence model parameters in ways that are not easily reversible. Regulators have acknowledged this tension. Legal analysis increasingly emphasizes that GDPR still applies, even if deletion is technically difficult, and organizations must take reasonable and proportional steps to honor erasure requests (Greenberg Traurig, 2023).

For learning management systems and enterprise training tools, the stakes are high. AI-driven personalization often relies on learner behavior, performance metrics, and sometimes identifiable information. That puts GDPR and AI governance squarely on the roadmap, not as a legal afterthought but as a design requirement.

Why GDPR Compliance in AI Training Data Matters

GDPR compliance is not only about avoiding fines. It is about trust. Learners, employees, and partners expect transparency and control over how their data is used.

Here is why the right to be forgotten in AI training data matters in practice:

  • Legal obligation. Organizations acting as data controllers must respond to valid erasure requests, even when data has been used to train models.
  • Reputational risk. Mishandling data deletion requests can quickly erode confidence, especially in education and HR contexts.
  • Ethical AI expectations. Regulators and users increasingly expect fairness, accountability, and respect for individual rights in automated systems.

    • The European Data Protection Supervisor has highlighted machine unlearning as a promising approach for addressing these challenges, noting its relevance to GDPR principles such as data minimization and storage limitation (European Data Protection Supervisor, n.d.).

    Machine Unlearning and the Future of the Right to Be Forgotten

    Machine unlearning refers to techniques that remove the influence of specific data points from a trained model without retraining from scratch. While still an active research area, it is becoming central to discussions about GDPR and AI.

    In practice, organizations often combine several strategies:

  • Designing models that limit reliance on direct identifiers
  • Maintaining clear lineage between raw data and trained models
  • Segmenting training datasets to allow selective retraining
  • Applying anonymization or aggregation where possible

    • No regulator currently expects perfection. What they do expect is demonstrable effort, proportional safeguards, and documented decision-making. The European Parliament’s analysis of GDPR and AI stresses the importance of explaining the logic of automated systems and the safeguards in place when personal data is involved (European Parliament, 2020).

    How Leveragai Approaches the Right to Be Forgotten in AI Training Data

    At Leveragai, GDPR and AI compliance is treated as a product responsibility, not just a policy statement. As an AI-powered learning management system, Leveragai processes learner data to personalize content, assess progress, and support decision-making. That makes data protection foundational.

    Leveragai’s approach includes:

  • Privacy-by-design architecture. Data minimization and purpose limitation are built into workflows across the platform. Details are outlined in the Leveragai Privacy Policy at https://www.leveragai.com/privacy.
  • Clear erasure processes. When a valid right to be forgotten request is received, Leveragai supports deletion or anonymization across operational systems and downstream analytics, consistent with GDPR guidance.
  • Model governance and documentation. Training datasets, update cycles, and retention periods are documented to support accountability and audits. More on this is available on the GDPR Compliance page at https://www.leveragai.com/compliance.
  • Human oversight. Automated decisions are complemented by human review, especially where learner outcomes or evaluations are involved.

    • Rather than treating AI models as opaque black boxes, Leveragai emphasizes traceability. That makes it possible to assess whether personal data is still necessary for a given purpose and how its removal may affect system behavior.

    A Practical Example from Learning Platforms

    Consider an employee who leaves an organization and exercises their right to be forgotten. Their performance data may have contributed, in aggregate, to improving course recommendations. Under GDPR, the organization must assess whether continued retention is necessary or lawful.

    In many cases, deleting or anonymizing the individual’s records while retaining generalized model improvements is acceptable, provided no identifiable information remains and the original purpose is respected. This risk-based approach aligns with regulatory commentary and industry practice (Greenberg Traurig, 2023).

    By designing AI training workflows with this scenario in mind, platforms like Leveragai can respond efficiently, without disrupting learning outcomes for others.

    GDPR, AI Training Data, and the Role of the Data Protection Officer

    GDPR also emphasizes organizational governance. Appointing a Data Protection Officer, where required, helps bridge legal, technical, and operational perspectives (GDPR-info.eu, n.d.). For AI-driven systems, this role becomes even more critical.

    Effective data protection governance typically includes:

  • Regular DPIAs for AI features that process personal data
  • Cross-functional reviews involving legal, technical, and product teams
  • Clear communication channels for data subject requests

    • Leveragai supports customers in this process by providing documentation and controls that integrate with existing compliance programs. The platform overview at https://www.leveragai.com/platform outlines how data governance fits into everyday learning operations.

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Q: Does GDPR require AI models to be retrained every time someone requests deletion? A: Not necessarily. GDPR requires reasonable steps to honor erasure requests. That may include deletion, anonymization, or mitigating the impact of data on models, depending on context and risk.

    Q: Is machine unlearning mandatory under GDPR? A: No. Machine unlearning is an emerging technique, not a legal requirement. However, regulators view it as a promising way to support GDPR principles in AI systems.

    Q: How does Leveragai help organizations manage AI data deletion? A: Leveragai provides structured data governance, erasure workflows, and documentation to support GDPR compliance in AI-powered learning environments.

    Conclusion

    GDPR and AI are no longer separate conversations. The right to be forgotten in AI training data forces organizations to think carefully about how models are built, updated, and governed. Technical limits do not override legal obligations, but thoughtful design can reconcile both.

    Leveragai approaches this challenge with pragmatism: privacy-by-design systems, clear erasure processes, and transparent governance that respects learners as individuals, not just data points. If your organization is navigating GDPR compliance in AI-driven learning, it is worth taking a closer look at how your platform handles training data today.

    Learn more about Leveragai’s approach to compliant, responsible AI at https://www.leveragai.com/contact and start a conversation with our team.

    References

    European Data Protection Supervisor. (n.d.). Machine unlearning. https://www.edps.europa.eu/data-protection/technology-monitoring/techsonar/machine-unlearning

    European Parliament. (2020). The impact of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) on artificial intelligence. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2020/641530/EPRS_STU(2020)641530_EN.pdf

    GDPR.eu. (2018). Right to be forgotten. https://gdpr.eu/right-to-be-forgotten/

    Greenberg Traurig. (2023). Under the GDPR, does a company that uses personal information to train an AI need to allow individuals to request removal from training data? https://www.gtlaw-dataprivacydish.com/2023/06/under-the-gdpr-does-a-company-that-uses-personal-information-to-train-an-ai-need-to-allow-individuals-to-request-that-their-information-be-removed-from-the-training-data/